![maharana pratap episode 467 maharana pratap episode 467](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-lDn91iujTs/hqdefault.jpg)
It has acquired all the characteristic features of the Christian Church such as the only Saviour, the only Revelation, the only Pope, the only priesthood, the only baptism, and the only sacraments. Bertrand Russell was not far wrong when he identified Communism as a Christian heresy. This led to heresy-hunting which in due course reduced Marxism to the status of a Semitic creed like Christianity and Islam. Communist societies, on the other hand, froze Marxist philosophy into a closed system of orthodoxy.
#MAHARANA PRATAP EPISODE 467 FREE#
The difference between Capitalism in the West and Communism in the East of Europe arose because Capitalist societies retained philosophical eclecticism and political pluralism as expressed in parliamentary democracy, a free press and free trade unions. The only crime of this other school of Socialism was that it objected to the relentless drive of Capitalism towards total mechanisation, industrialisation and centralisation, reducing the individual human being to a helpless entity. Marx reserved his choicest praise for Capitalism and his choicest abuse for what he denounced as Utopian Socialism. In this larger ideological context, Marxism is a logical culmination of Capitalism. A centralised economy and an urbanised society are a natural follow-up of this world-view. In this world-view, man is essentially a homo fabricus, a tool-maker or mechanic. This ideological affinity between Communism and Macaulayism is ultimately derived from a common source in the modern West-materialistic metaphysics, evolutionistic sociology, utilitarian ethics, hedonistic psychology, etc. The long record of our parliamentary debates is a witness of how, after the death of Sardar Patel, die treasury benches have always evinced an awed deference towards utterly unparliamentary and downright demagogic vituperations from Communist members. It has sadly deplored, if not condoned, as misguided idealism even the most heinous crimes of the Communists. Macaulayism has always tried to understand and explain away the misdeeds of Communism in this country. That is why Macaulayism has always been on the defensive and apologetic vis-a-vis Communism. That is why Communism is strongest today in those areas where Macaulayism had earlier spread its widest spell. Ideologically, Communism in India is, in several respects, a sort of extension of Macaulayism, a residue of the British rule. Again, during the Second World War, that Government partronised, financed and fraternised with the Communist Party of India and helped it attain the stature of an independent political party. This was done in order to wean them away from “terrorism.” Many of them came out as convinced Communists while still wearing the halo of national heroes. In the ‘thirties, that Government encouraged non-Communist revolutionaries in its jails to read Communist literature. Though Communism in India cannot be characterised as a residue of the British rule, the British Government did make some substantial contributions to its growth. We also warn that neither the Soviet Union nor the Communist movement in our country should be permitted to close our other options while we are faced and have to deal with American interventionism. We value that friendship, though we would like to emphasize that the Soviet Union needs India’s friendship as much as India needs hers.
![maharana pratap episode 467 maharana pratap episode 467](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aqowaGMGuuc/maxresdefault.jpg)
Our friendship with the Soviet Union has matured in the midst of a fast moving world. Now we shall take up Communism which, though not exactly a residue of foreign rule, is yet a foreign imposition of the most malignant character.īut before we proceed, we wish to make it clear that nothing in this article should be construed as a hostile criticism of Indo-Soviet relations. We have characterised Islamism as malevolent, Christianism as mischievous, and Macaulayism as mild, though like a slow poison. We have so far discussed the role of the residues of foreign rule in India vis-a-vis Hindu society. A Communist cannot help being a traitor to his country and his people.)
![maharana pratap episode 467 maharana pratap episode 467](http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/xfCVXGfUd54/hqdefault.jpg)
It is quite on the cards that this mercenary outfit will be bought over, in due course, by some other power or powers hostile to positive Indian nationalism. But its hostility towards Hindu society and culture remains undiminished. Now the Soviet Union has disappeared from the scene and the Communist movement in India does not know whom to serve.